Anthropic+192Endpoint difference across sampled ratings; methods changed.
Chart system · archive through 2025-08-29
Three ways to read the same AI race.
Each view preserves providers as the protagonists, uses one green highlight, and keeps every claim inside the sourced archive window.
Chatbot Arena archive
Sampled provider frontier ratings, May 2023 to August 2025
Meta highlighted. 827 to 1288 published rating; sampled peak 1396.
Line ends, top to bottom:Google 1466Mistral 1433xAI 1431OpenAI 1429DeepSeek 1424Anthropic 1417Meta 1288
Variation 03 · gap chase
How far did each lab sit from first?
Meta began 447 rating points behind the May 2023 sampled leader and finished 178 points back in August 2025. Because LMArena changed methods during the window, these endpoint gaps are descriptive, not a like-for-like gain.
Leader0
Google0
Mistral-33
xAI-36
OpenAI-37
DeepSeek-42Anthropic-50
Meta-178Variation 04 · reign tape
Who held the archive lead?
Each segment marks the leading provider at one of the 11 selected snapshots. This is snapshot tenure, not a claim about every day between them.
2023-05OpenAI
OpenAI2023-07Anthropic
Anthropic2023-10Anthropic
Anthropic2023-12OpenAI
OpenAI2024-03OpenAI
OpenAI2024-06OpenAI
OpenAI2024-08OpenAI
OpenAI2024-11OpenAI
OpenAI2025-02Google
Google2025-05Google
Google2025-08Google
GoogleSnapshot leads: OpenAI 6 · Google 3 · Anthropic 2
Variation 05 · head to head
Anthropic vs OpenAI, snapshot by snapshot.
Anthropic+192OpenAI+155Endpoint difference across sampled ratings; methods changed.
Derived values: Anthropic +192; OpenAI +155 rating points. These are not normalized across methodology changes.