Side-by-side sourced facts
Both columns quote the same reviewed Epoch AI catalog artifact. The LMArena row quotes the separately pinned snapshot published July 12, 2026 and appears only for an exact source model match. Missing values stay missing.
| Field |  Gemini 3.1 Pro |  Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | |
| Released | February 19, 2026 | April 5, 2025 |
| Domains | Language, Vision | Multimodal, Language, Vision |
| Tasks | Language modeling/generation | Chat, Code generation, Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering |
| Access | API access | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Weights | Closed weights | Open weights |
| LMArena rating | No exact model match in this snapshot | No exact model match in this snapshot |
| Context window | Not reported by this source | Not reported by this source |
| Price | Not reported by this source | Not reported by this source |
Common questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro better than Llama 4 Scout?
No published ranking covers both models in Model Gauntlet's approved sources: the LMArena snapshot published July 12, 2026 has no exact match for either model. The Epoch catalog documents what each model is for; it does not measure which is better.
Which is newer, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
According to Epoch AI's model catalog (retrieved July 14, 2026), Gemini 3.1 Pro is newer: it was released February 19, 2026, while Llama 4 Scout was released April 5, 2025.
Can you self-host Gemini 3.1 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
Only Llama 4 Scout, according to the Epoch records: it ships open weights with a stated use restriction, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is a closed-weight model with API access only.
Evidence boundary
This page declares no winner beyond what a named source's numbers say. Where the sources do not overlap, the page says so plainly. Task quality, price, context window, latency, and reliability are not reported by these sources, so no claim about them appears here. Both models still require hands-on evaluation on your own workload.