Head-to-head · Sources current through July 14, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro

According to LMArena's snapshot published July 12, 2026, Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 scores 1507.5 and DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4-Pro scores 1457.1 in the style-controlled text category. Those two numbers are the only shared ranking evidence between these models in Model Gauntlet's approved sources.

Side-by-side sourced facts

Both columns quote the same reviewed Epoch AI catalog artifact. The LMArena row quotes the separately pinned snapshot published July 12, 2026 and appears only for an exact source model match. Missing values stay missing.

Source-backed facts for Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro
FieldClaude Fable 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
ReleasedJune 9, 2026April 24, 2026
DomainsLanguage, MultimodalLanguage
TasksLanguage modeling/generation, Question answeringLanguage modeling/generation, Question answering
AccessAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
WeightsClosed weightsOpen weights
LMArena rating1507.5 (95% interval 1500.0 to 1515.0, 7,856 battles)1457.1 (95% interval 1452.6 to 1461.6, 41,800 battles)
Context windowNot reported by this sourceNot reported by this source
PriceNot reported by this sourceNot reported by this source

Shared evidence in the Epoch records: Language (domain), Language modeling/generation (task), Question answering (task).

Common questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek-V4-Pro?

According to LMArena's snapshot published July 12, 2026, Claude Fable 5 rates higher (1507.5 vs 1457.1) in the style-controlled text category, and the reported 95% intervals do not overlap in that snapshot. That is one source's conversational-preference measurement, not proof of overall superiority.

Which is newer, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro?

According to Epoch AI's model catalog (retrieved July 14, 2026), Claude Fable 5 is newer: it was released June 9, 2026, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro was released April 24, 2026.

Can you self-host Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro?

Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro, according to the Epoch records: it ships unrestricted open weights, while Claude Fable 5 is a closed-weight model with API access only.

Evidence boundary

This page declares no winner beyond what a named source's numbers say. Where the sources do not overlap, the page says so plainly. Task quality, price, context window, latency, and reliability are not reported by these sources, so no claim about them appears here. Both models still require hands-on evaluation on your own workload.